Court quashes death sentence for two robbery with violence convicts
The High Court had previously upheld the trial court's decision, but the appellate court found that both lower courts failed to properly assess the flaws in the evidence.
The Court of Appeal has set aside the death sentences of two convicts who had been found guilty of a violent robbery that resulted in the death of a man at Sun Africa Bar in Isiolo in 2014.
In a judgment delivered by Justices Jamila Mohammed, Jessy Lesiit, and Ali-Aroni, the appellate court found that the evidence presented against the two at trial fell short of the legal threshold for upholding a conviction, particularly on the issues of identification and recent possession.
More To Read
- Three suspects in Kasipul MP Ong’ondo Were murder case remain in custody as court denies them bond
- Nairobi businessman charged with robbery, assault of comedian Bella Comedy at Kutit Festival
- School driver, teacher in court for negligence after five-year-old jumps from moving van
- Two men charged over possession of dozens of national ID Cards, hundreds of SIM cards
- Police officer arrested for hurling colleague off fourth-floor balcony in Kitengela
- Fraud suspects found with dozens of ID cards, SIM cards and electronic gadgets detained
They set aside the convictions of Samson Mwingirwa and Michael Murungi.
The two had been charged and convicted of two counts of robbery with violence. The prosecution alleged they were part of a gang that broke into the bar on the night of August 5, 2014, stealing crates of alcohol, electronics, and other valuables worth over Sh100,000, and fatally injuring a man identified as Karuru.
"Evidence of identification in difficult circumstances needs to be treated with utmost care," the court said.
The judges also dismissed the prosecution's reliance on a dying declaration allegedly made by the deceased victim, stating that medical witnesses confirmed the victim was gravely injured and likely incapable of speech when police claimed he named one of his attackers.
Further, while police said stolen items were recovered from the appellants' homes, the court found no concrete proof that the goods, mostly common household items, belonged to the complainant. No receipts, serial numbers, or other definitive evidence of ownership were produced.
"The complainant should have produced the receipts with serial numbers... the items were everyday household items, and pointing them out was not adequate," the bench observed in its judgment.
A key eyewitness, David Kinoti, claimed he saw one of the attackers by torchlight during the robbery.
However, the appellate court ruled that the conditions for visual identification were unreliable, noting that there was no clear evidence about the size, brightness, or direction of the light.
The High Court had previously upheld the trial court's decision, but the appellate court found that both lower courts failed to properly assess the flaws in the evidence.
As a result, the court quashed both the conviction and sentence and ordered the immediate release of the two appellants unless otherwise lawfully held.
Top Stories Today
