Eliud Lagat given until July 18 to respond to application seeking his removal, prosecution over Albert Ojwang’s murder

Ojwang was killed while in detention at Central Police Station on the night of June 7. He had been arrested by Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) officers following a complaint by Lagat accusing him of cyberbullying. Lagat later stepped aside to allow investigations into the incident.
Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) Eliud Lagat has until July 18 to respond to a High Court application seeking his removal from office and prosecution over the murder of Homa Bay teacher Albert Ojwang.
Justice Chacha Mwita directed that Lagat, the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), President William Ruto, Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja, and Director of Criminal Investigations Mohamed Amin be served with the court orders immediately.
More To Read
- LSK condemns CS Kipchumba Murkomen's 'shoot-to-kill order', warns police against illegal directives
- Families of victims demand probe into extrajudicial killings, torture
- Former CJ David Maraga says security withdrawn over 'June 25 memorial protests support'
- LSK condemns police brutality, sexual violence, media blackout during June 25 memorial protests
- Albert Ojwang murder: Activists urge court to hold DIG Eliud Lagat accountable
- Deserter GSU officer among six charged with murder of Ojwang at Central Police Station
The respondents are required to file and serve their respective responses to both the application and the petition by close of business on July 18.
They have been sued, alongside others, as respondents in a case where a group of activists is seeking the temporary suspension of the trial of three police officers and three civilians charged with Ojwang’s murder.
The application was filed by activists led by lawyer Lempaa Suyinka and Prof Fredrick Ogola, who want the High Court to halt the ongoing trial until Lagat is formally charged as the primary suspect.
“The respondents (Lagat, IPOA, DPP, Ruto, Kanja, Amin, and others) and interested parties shall enter their appearance and file and serve their responses to both the application and petition by close of business on July 18, 2025,” ordered the judge.
Rejoinders and rebuttals to the respondents’ submissions are to be filed and served by August 8, 2025. Only parties who have complied with these timelines will be permitted to highlight their written submissions in court.

Ojwang was killed while in detention at Central Police Station on the night of June 7. He had been arrested by Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) officers following a complaint by Lagat accusing him of cyberbullying. Lagat later stepped aside to allow investigations into the incident.
The activists moved to the High Court on June 24, seeking orders to bar Lagat from resuming office pending the hearing and determination of their application.
Their main plea is to stop the prosecution of Nairobi Central Police Station Commander (OCS) Samson Talaam and his juniors- Constables James Mukhwana and Peter Kimani- alongside three civilian accomplices, until Lagat is included in the charge sheet as the principal suspect.
The three police officers are charged alongside criminal suspects John Ngige Gitau, Gin Ammitou Abwao, and Brian Mwaniki Njue, who were already in custody before Ojwang was brought in.
Gitau, Abwao, and Njue are alleged to have been paid to "discipline" Ojwang while he was in custody. He died in the process, and the six suspects were charged with his murder at the Kibera Law Courts.
The activists have sued IPOA, the DPP, the National Police Service (NPS), Lagat, and President Ruto as respondents, accusing them of orchestrating a scheme to shield Lagat from criminal responsibility in Ojwang’s death.
The six individuals charged in Nairobi High Court Criminal Case No. E010 of 2025—Republic v. Samson Talaam and five others—are also listed as respondents in the suit.
Through their lawyer Kibe Mungai, the petitioners argue that inconsistent and contradictory decisions by the DPP and IPOA, in excluding Lagat from the charge sheet, have violated Kenyans' legitimate expectations that justice for Ojwang would include the prosecution of Lagat as the main suspect.
“Notwithstanding the obvious malice, ill-will and ulterior motives behind the complaint (by Lagat), the DPP and IPOA have disregarded this and instead instituted frivolous and malicious charges against Talaam, Mukhwana, Kimani, Gitau, Abwao, and Njue,” the petition reads.
“No criminal charges have been brought against Lagat despite credible evidence implicating him in the murder of Albert Ojwang. The principles under Section 4 of the ODPP Act have been ignored or breached in this prosecution, thereby setting the stage for a miscarriage of justice,” the petitioners contend.
Justice Mwita scheduled the highlighting of the application for August 11, 2025.
Top Stories Today
Reader Comments
Trending
