CJ Koome's security withdrawal sparks public debate

The withdrawal of security assigned to Chief Justice Martha Koome has triggered widespread reactions, with some Kenyans condemning the move as a threat to judicial independence while others expressed contrasting views.

Chief Justice Koome, in a protest letter to Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen, called the withdrawal a violation of the principle of separation of powers.

"The withdrawal of this security detail is an egregious affront to the principle of separation of powers. It destabilizes the delicate balance upon which democratic governance is founded," she stated, urging the National Police Service to restore her security.

However, the National Police Service refuted the claims, stating that the officers had been recalled for promotional courses and replaced.

"The National Police Service reiterates its commitment to multi-agency collaboration and cooperation within the criminal justice system of Kenya," said outgoing Spokesperson Resila Onyango.

The move has drawn criticism from leaders such as Wiper Party leader Kalonzo Musyoka, who described it as unacceptable.

"This despicable action is designed to undermine the independence of the office of the Chief Justice and, by extension, the Judiciary and other independent institutions. It must be opposed by all spirited Kenyans," he said.

Former nominated senator Millicent Omanga also condemned the decision.

"Whatever the issues in contention may be, withdrawing the security detail of CJ Martha Koome sends a bad signal, infringes on the independence of the Judiciary, exposes judicial officers to danger, and hampers the delivery of justice. May reason prevail," she said.

Kenyans also had different views on the matter.

Some citizens expressed sympathy for the Chief Justice, emphasizing the importance of judicial protection.

"This is a dangerous precedent. If the head of the Judiciary can be treated this way, what about the ordinary citizen?" one concerned Kenyan remarked.

Others accused Parliament of failing to legislate for judicial independence effectively.

"Blame Parliament for this mess. They should have ensured proper safeguards, but instead, the Judiciary is left vulnerable," said another.

A few, however, supported the move, arguing that the Judiciary must not be immune to accountability.

Other Topics To Read

• National
• Chief Justice Martha Koome
• judiciary budget cut
• Judiciary funding
• CJ Koome's security withdrawal sparks public debate
• Headlines

"The Judiciary should focus on its mandate instead of claiming victimhood. No one is above scrutiny," a critic commented on social media.