Kenya courts UK deals amid infrastructure lessons and uneven gains in London visit
The Nairobi Railway City project was touted as a major win for British architects, engineers, and legal consultants, with financing expected to come through UK Export Finance.
Kenya’s top leadership, led by President William Ruto and accompanied by key ministers and principal secretaries, spent Tuesday in London, officially to strengthen the country’s strategic partnership with the United Kingdom.
But the subtext was harder to miss: a crash course in functioning infrastructure, delivered at the bustling King's Cross railway station.
More To Read
- Ruto clashes with courts over roadblocks ban, accuses Judiciary of undermining security
- Moses Kuria resigns as President William Ruto’s senior economic advisor
- First Lady Rachel Ruto admits 'ground realities' hindering project delivery
- From bottom-up to top-down: Is President William Ruto reversing course?
- Lawyer seeks court order to stop Ruto’s Sh1.2 billion megachurch at State House
- Tuesday court verdict on President Ruto’s IEBC nominees could reshape Kenya’s electoral path
The irony was unmistakable: the very site Nairobi hopes to replicate through the long-promised Nairobi Railway City — London’s gleaming, fully operational King’s Cross station — stood in stark contrast to its still largely aspirational Kenyan counterpart.
Despite repeated declarations of its "game-changing" potential since it was unveiled, the Nairobi Railway City project has seen little progress since UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly visited Nairobi in 2023.
In Britain's favour
UK officials were more candid.
In their readout, UK officials highlighted over £1 billion (Sh178 billion) in trade and investment deals—heavily tilted in Britain's favour—that are expected to generate jobs in regions like Durham, Northamptonshire, and Surrey.
The Nairobi Railway City project was cited as a boon for British architects, engineers, and legal consultants, with financing likely to be arranged through UK Export Finance.
Kenya, meanwhile, framed the visit as a diplomatic windfall.
The State House dispatch released by Hussein Mohammed trumpeted ambitious pledges: training 2.5 million Kenyans in digital skills, unlocking billions in green finance, and reaffirming Nairobi's growing role as a regional financial hub.
The difference in messaging is striking.
Where Kenya emphasised opportunity and optimism, Britain saw tangible returns and domestic job creation.
Counter-migration efforts
The UK even linked the partnership to counter-migration efforts, citing Kenya's strategic position near the migratory routes of Eritreans, Sudanese, Somalis, and Ethiopians.
Kenya's version of events was, understandably, more discreet.
Notably absent from Nairobi's statement was any mention of the £70 million (Sh12.5 billion) in defence deals announced by London, a politically sensitive subject in Kenya, given ongoing scrutiny of human rights abuses and British military presence in Laikipia.
Nor did Kenya acknowledge the UK's focus on disrupting trafficking routes — a nod, perhaps, to divergent domestic audiences.
In the end, Kenya walked away with promises, plans, and polished diplomacy—while Britain secured contracts, market access, and a fresh example of how strategic soft power can translate into economic gains.
Top Stories Today
