How public participation against my impeachment was biased - Gachagua
By John Mbati |
"My response was not part of what was presented to the people of Kenya," Gachagua argued.
Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has asserted that the public participation process related to his impeachment motion was biased, claiming that parliamentarians did not give him a chance to note down his defence.
Speaking to the media on Monday at his home in Karen, Gachagua noted that while Kenyans shared public opinions on the 11 allegations against him, they did not have access to his defence.
Keep reading
- Court to rule on Governor Kawira Mwangaza's impeachment case on December 18
- Judiciary faces allegations of e-filing sabotage in petition linked to Gachagua
- Court of Appeal deals blow to Gachagua in plea to bar Kindiki swearing in
- CS Duale details Gachagua’s political missteps that led to impeachment
“An attempt to do public participation in a very shoddy exercise that was done. My response was not part of what was presented to the people of Kenya."
“Kenyans were asked to give their views as to whether the DP should be impeached from office and the accusations were attached but in a highly legalistic language beyond the comprehension of many Kenyans. The response of the DP was not there to enable them to make an informed decision,” he argued.
Public participation regarding the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua officially began across Kenya on Friday, October 4, 2024.
The forums were held across the 47 counties, allowing Kenyans to voice their opinions on the special motion introduced by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse.
However, in various sections of the country, the forums were marred with violence, and a group of Kenyans defended Gachagua and also called for Ruto's ouster.
Gachagua's efforts to halt public participation failed after the High Court declined his application on the same. The DP had claimed that the forums were not conducted according to legislative procedures.
He also argued that the forum should be held across all 290 constituencies in the diaspora, and the 1,450 electoral wards involved in presidential elections.
In his defence, he added that the one-day public participation exercise was "grossly insufficient to facilitate any meaningful public participation".
Reader comments
Follow Us and Stay Connected!
We'd love for you to join our community and stay updated with our latest stories and updates. Follow us on our social media channels and be part of the conversation!
Let's stay connected and keep the dialogue going!
Latest News For You
