ICJ dismisses Sudan’s genocide case against UAE over alleged support to RSF
In a decision issued on Monday, the UN's top court ruled that it "manifestly lacked" jurisdiction to hear the case, effectively ending the proceedings.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has dismissed a case filed by Sudan against the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which alleged that Abu Dhabi violated the 1948 Genocide Convention by arming and financing the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan's ongoing civil war.
In a decision issued on Monday, the UN's top court ruled that it "manifestly lacked" jurisdiction to hear the case, effectively ending the proceedings.
More To Read
- 17 areas of Sudan "at risk of famine": UN spokesman
- ‘Only hunger and bombs’ for besieged civilians in Sudan’s El Fasher
- RSF attack on Darfur camp kills 40 civilians, injures 19 in escalating Sudan conflict
- After starvation in Gaza and Sudan, refeeding syndrome a risk
- Libya linked to Sudan’s RSF military camp as UN condemns arms flow amid ongoing Darfur conflict
- 16 killed, eight injured in paramilitary forces attack in western Sudan - volunteer groups
Although both Sudan and the UAE are signatories to the Genocide Convention, the UAE maintains a reservation to the specific article that allows the ICJ to settle disputes under the treaty. That legal carveout shielded it from being subjected to the court's jurisdiction.
In March, Sudan had asked the court to impose several provisional measures, including an order compelling the UAE to "do all it can to prevent the killing and other crimes targeting the Masalit people in Darfur".
But the UAE, dismissing the case as a "publicity stunt," challenged the court's authority during an oral hearing in April. Its legal team firmly argued that "the court had no jurisdiction" over the matter.
The case stems from the brutal civil war that erupted in Sudan in April 2023, when tensions between the regular army and the paramilitary RSF exploded into open conflict in Khartoum, eventually engulfing several parts of the country, especially Darfur.
Both warring sides have been accused of atrocities and violations of international humanitarian law.
The UAE, a key Gulf power and close US ally, has come under growing scrutiny over its alleged support for the RSF, a claim it has consistently denied despite mounting evidence.
With the ICJ's decision, Sudan's attempt to hold a foreign actor legally accountable for its spiralling internal conflict has hit a wall, highlighting the legal and diplomatic complexities of attributing international responsibility in proxy-influenced civil wars.
Top Stories Today
- Medicine shortages, SHA challenges leave Kenyan patients struggling
- Ruku urges north eastern residents to register for IDs as barriers lifted
- Mwembe Tayari locals protest exclusion from Mombasa water project
- National Assembly approves Ruto’s nominees to police service commission
- Interfaith initiative praised for fostering harmony in Garissa
- MPs reject proposal to divert road maintenance funds for administrative use
