Mutunga, Karua sue Tanzania at EAC court over detention, deportation ahead of Tundu Lissu trial
They are seeking a public apology from the Tanzanian government, along with general and special damages for mental distress, reputational harm, and incurred travel costs.
Former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, lawyer Martha Karua, and four others have filed a case against the Tanzanian government at the East African Court of Justice (EACJ), alleging unlawful detention, refusal of entry, and deportation.
The group, which includes activists and human rights defenders Gloria Kimani, Lynn Ngugi, Hussein Khalid, and Hanifa Adan, claims their rights as East African citizens were violated when they were barred from entering Tanzania to observe the treason trial of opposition leader Tundu Lissu.
More To Read
- Tanzania proposes mandatory travel insurance fee for tourists
- Ex-CJ David Maraga rubbishes 'Ruto project' tag, denies eying AG role
- Somalia and Tanzania to resume direct flights, reopen Dar embassy, and deepen bilateral ties
- Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu leads own defense in treason trial, slams case as baseless
- Ethiopia begins supplying electricity to Tanzania through Kenya’s transmission network
- Enough is enough! Man lashes out at DCI in court over blogger Ndiang’ui Kinyagia's disappearance
They are seeking a public apology from the Tanzanian government, along with general and special damages for mental distress, reputational harm, and incurred travel costs.
In court documents, they state: "On May 18 and 19, 2025, we were detained without explanation at Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar es Salaam, had our passports confiscated, and were subsequently deported back to Kenya. We had travelled to Tanzania as part of an international observer mission to monitor Lissu’s trial, which was scheduled to begin on May 19."
The petition accuses Tanzania of breaching multiple provisions of the East African Community (EAC) Treaty, including commitments to the rule of law, good governance, transparency, and the free movement of persons across member states.
The claimants further argue that their exclusion undermined civic participation and violated the principle of open justice, as they were denied the opportunity to observe a trial of regional significance.
Filed jointly with public interest litigants, the East Africa Law Society (EALS) and the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), the case contends that Tanzania’s actions contravene Articles 6(d), 7(2), 76, 104, and 8(1)(c) of the EAC Treaty and the EAC Common Market Protocol (2009).
The applicants also seek the removal of "refused entry" endorsements from their passports and a court order restraining Tanzania from further obstructing the free movement of East African citizens.
The case is expected to be transferred to the EACJ in Arusha, with a hearing date to be set in the coming weeks.
The outcome could establish a precedent for enforcing regional rights within the East African Community.
Top Stories Today
