High Court to rule on Gachagua plea for bench to hear impeachment petitions
By Joseph Ndunda |
Muite said the impeachment of a deputy president and the president cannot be equated with that of a governor or deputy governor.
The High Court will on Friday rule on whether the petitions challenging the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua will be heard by a bench of three or five as sought by his lawyers.
Gachagua's lawyers, led by senior counsel Paul Muite and Elisha Ongoya, made an application before Justice Lawrence Mugambi to forward the file to Chief Justice Martha Koome to form the bench.
Keep reading
- I’m independent-minded, Kindiki says as he tells off critics calling him Ruto's ‘yes man’
- Kindiki urges counties, Controller of Budget to work harmoniously in resource allocation
- SHA, Finance Bill, Gachagua impeachment top Google’s most popular searches by Kenyans in 2024
- Gachagua allies demand probe into Limuru chaos, accuse police of abducting ex-MP Mwathi
Muite's team argued that there are weighty and serious questions of the law that need a bench of an even number of judges to determine.
While seeking the referral, Muite and colleagues told the court that the petitions by Gachagua and four others argue that the public participation was not done properly and the DP was not given a fair hearing at the National Assembly before the impeachment motion was tabled.
Muite said the public participation held last week ought to have been done before the impeachment motion was placed before members of the Parliament and not days after.
He added that Gachagua should have also been allowed to defend himself against the accusations against him before the impeachment motion was tendered in Parliament.
"The public participation is wholly inadequate and against the guidelines given by the Supreme Court earlier," Muite said.
But lawyers Peter Wanyama and Paul Nyamondi, who are representing the National Assembly, opposed the application stating that the proceedings of Parliament were legal and conducted according to the law and procedures.
The two said the issues raised in the petitions before the court have been overtaken by events since the National Assembly has already concluded the impeachment. They said the National Assembly has no powers to go back to the process of impeaching Gachagua that was concluded Tuesday night.
But Muite dismissed the arguments saying the issues are not related to the current events and are very live because anything done contrary to the Constitution is a nullity and Gachagua is not to blame.
Muite said the impeachment of a deputy president and the president cannot be equated with that of a governor or deputy governor.
"The petition is not about the current events. Let's argue the issue before a bench of an even number because these are serious issues that will guide this process in the future," Muite said.
Lawyer Ndegwa Njiru said according to Article 165 (3) (d) of the Constitution, the High Court has the power to interrogate actions of any state organ to determine if it was done appropriately.
"The court can't stop that process but when the state organ is done with the process, the court can decide on the legality of the process and the conduct of the state organ," Njiru said.
The Senate will be holding sessions on October 16 and 17 to hear the impeachment before sending Gachagua home if they uphold the motion to remove him from office.
Reader comments
Follow Us and Stay Connected!
We'd love for you to join our community and stay updated with our latest stories and updates. Follow us on our social media channels and be part of the conversation!
Let's stay connected and keep the dialogue going!
Latest News For You
